Open Source Designer Ruins Broadly Utilize Libraries, Influencing Huge Loads Of Ventures
A designer seems to have deliberately debased a couple of open-source libraries on GitHub and programming vault npm — “faker.js” and “colors.js” — that a large number of clients rely upon, delivering any venture that contains these libraries futile, as revealed by Bleeping Computer. While it seems as though color.js has been refreshed to a functioning rendition, faker.js still has all the earmarks of being impacted, yet the issue can be worked around by minimizing to a past variant (5.5.3).
Even more curiously, the faker.js Readme file has also been changed to “What really happened with Aaron Swartz?” Swartz was a prominent developer who helped establish Creative Commons, RSS, and Reddit.
In 2011, Swartz was charged for stealing documents from the academic database JSTOR with the purpose of making them free to access, and later committed suicide in 2013. Squires’ mention of Swartz could potentially refer to conspiracy theories surrounding his death.
As pointed out by Bleeping Computer, a number of users — including some working with Amazon’s Cloud Development Kit — turned to GitHub’s bug tracking system to voice their concerns about the issue.
In response to the problem, Squires posted an update on GitHub to address the “zalgo issue,” which refers to the glitchy text that the corrupt files produce. “It’s come to our attention that there is a zalgo bug in the v1.4.44-liberty-2 release of colors,” Squires writes in a presumably sarcastic way. “Please know we are working right now to fix the situation and will have a resolution shortly.”
Two days after pushing the corrupt update to faker.js, Squires later sent out a tweet noting he’s been suspended from GitHub, despite storing hundreds of projects on the site. Judging by the changelog on both faker.js and colors.js, however, it looks like his suspension has already been lifted. Squires introduced the faker.js commit on January 4th, got banned on January 6th, and didn’t introduce the “liberty” version of colors.js until January 7th. It’s unclear whether Squires’ account has been banned again. The Verge reached out to GitHub with a request for comment but didn’t immediately hear back.
The story doesn’t end there, though. Bleeping Computer dug up one of Squires’ posts on GitHub from November 2020, in which he declares he no longer wants to do free work. “Respectfully, I am no longer going to support Fortune 500s (and other smaller sized companies) with my free work,” he says. “Take this as an opportunity to send me a six figure yearly contract or fork the project and have someone else work on it.”
Squires’ bold move draws attention to the moral — and financial — dilemma of open-source development, which was likely the goal of his actions. A massive number of websites, software, and apps rely on open-source developers to create essential tools and components — all for free. It’s the same issue that results in unpaid developers working tirelessly to fix the security issues in their open-source software, like the Heartbleed scare in 2014 that affected OpenSSL and the more recent Log4Shell vulnerability found in log4j that left volunteers scrambling to fix.